Pro Se Litigation

Chris Daniel headshot — Engineering Systems for Attention & Income

When it feels like you're all alone.

Welcome folks. This is where I’ve dedicated myself to a pro se litigation journey — a personal effort to understand and navigate the civil justice system.


My Legal Journey's Ugly Beginnings

From time to time, individuals might find themselves facing what appear to be bad actors. It's often unclear if these individuals are acting alone or in concert with others. Likewise, one might not know if middle or upper management would support such individuals if caught behaving badly. And if so, whether they would then commit further poor behavior and/or act in bad faith to cover up or conceal their own actions.

However, such situations do sometimes occur. Now, at over 50 years old, I've encountered a scenario that places me (alone) against a large organization. Despite repeated warnings about their conduct, their actions have only escalated the situation.

While I cannot delve into any specific details – and please understand that I will NOT litigate any case online – I invite you to join me on the educational journey of navigating the legal system. If you're a paralegal, a first-year litigation attorney, or simply someone interested in the practicalities of self-representation, feel free to follow along. I'll be studying each process in advance, preparing for the next stage as it approaches. Win or lose, you'll gain a unique "real-world" education from following my progress here. And if you have any general legal suggestions or insights to share, please feel free to send me a message.

Sometimes it feels like the bigger the organization (and the larger its legal team), the easier it is for ordinary people to be worn down by process instead of heard on the merits. Over time, that can actually encourage more bad behavior and fewer consequences. It makes you wonder where basic ethics and morals have gone.


What You'll Find Here:

  • Insights into Civil Procedure: A look at the stages of a civil lawsuit, from initial filings to discovery and trial.

  • Understanding Courtroom Dynamics: Exploring concepts like evidence rules, witness examination, and the purpose of objections.

  • Resource Sharing: Links to educational videos, articles, and guides that have aided my learning.

  • A Pro Se Perspective: My personal reflections on the challenges and opportunities of representing oneself in court.

What This Page Is NOT:

  • This page does not discuss any specific ongoing legal case, individuals, or entities.

  • I am not providing legal advice. Anyone facing a legal issue should consult with qualified legal counsel.

  • This is not a platform for litigation or public argument regarding any specific dispute.

So again, "This site serves as a professional journal for self-instruction and a transparent record of the educational journey through the civil justice system. All case-specific facts and legal arguments are reserved for the appropriate judicial forum."


My hope is that by openly sharing my learning experience, this page might offer encouragement or a starting point for others who find themselves on a similar path of self-representation. The goal is simply to be "good enough" to navigate the system effectively and ensure my voice is heard.


I don’t want to suggest that YouTube is the place you should learn your legal procedures from, and it’s not where I’m getting my primary guidance either. That said, YouTube can sometimes provide helpful explanations, visual demonstrations, and practical tips that are worth exploring—especially when you’re trying to understand how things look and sound in real time.

Many subject‑matter experts are brilliant at what they do but don’t know jack about creating and editing videos or building an online presence. Meanwhile, some educators on YouTube are excellent at taking complex ideas and explaining them in plain English.

Channels like LegalEagle, Steve Lehto, or The Law Simplified often have civil procedure or lawsuit-basics content. You can search phrases like “civil lawsuit basics [channel name]” and choose the clearest explanations for your learning style.

On this page, I’ll keep things simple by featuring just one or two videos for each major stage of the process. You may want to go deeper—watch several videos on the same topic and even compare different channels to get a wider range of perspectives from different educators.


General Overview


Stage 1: Filing and Early Motions

In civil trials, early motions are formal requests filed before trial to resolve issues, manage the case, or even end it, covering things like dismissing the case (Motion to Dismiss), blocking evidence (Motion to Suppress/In Limine), or asking for judgment without trial (Motion for Summary Judgment), all aimed at streamlining the process and focusing on real disputes. Common examples include motions to dismiss, compel discovery, transfer venue, or for summary judgment, all critical steps to shape the litigation before it reaches a jury. 

Types of Motions & Key Terms:

  • Complaint: The legal document that starts a lawsuit, outlining the plaintiff's claims and the relief sought.

  • Motion to Dismiss: Asks the court to throw out some or all claims, often for legal insufficiency (e.g., improper jurisdiction, bad service).

  • Motion to Strike: Removes irrelevant or improper parts from pleadings.

  • Motion to Compel Discovery: Forces the opposing party to provide requested information or documents.

  • Motion for Summary Judgment: Argues there are no disputed facts and the case can be decided as a matter of law, ending the trial.

  • Motion to Suppress: Keeps certain evidence or statements out of trial.

  • Motion for Change of Venue: Requests the case be moved to a different court location.

  • Motion in Limine: Asks the judge to rule on the admissibility of certain evidence before trial begins. 

  • Pleadings: Formal written statements filed with the court that describe a party's legal or factual assertions.

Purpose of Early Motions

  • Efficiency: Resolves issues early, preventing unnecessary trials.

  • Fairness: Ensures only relevant evidence is presented.

  • Case Management: Helps narrow the issues for trial.

  • Outcome: Can win or lose the case before trial starts. 

How They Work

  • Filing: A party files a written motion with the court.

  • Response: The other side files a written opposition (or support).

  • Hearing: A judge may hold a hearing with arguments and testimony.

  • Ruling: The judge decides whether to grant or deny the motion. 


Stage 2: Discovery

In a civil trial, a Request for Production (RFP) is a formal discovery tool (under FRCP Rule 34) where one party demands specific documents, emails (ESI), photos, or other physical evidence from the opposing side to support claims, build their case, or uncover the other's evidence, ensuring a fair, informed trial by exchanging relevant materials like financial records, contracts, or digital communications. Parties must respond by producing documents, stating objections (like privilege), or providing a privilege log if withholding information, often after a "meet and confer". 

Key Terms:

  • Discovery: The formal process of exchanging information between parties about the witnesses and evidence to be presented at trial.

  • Interrogatories: A set of written questions used in the discovery phase that one party sends to another to be answered under oath.

  • Request for Production (RFP): A legal request for the opposition to provide specific documents or tangible items for inspection.

  • Affidavit: A written statement of facts confirmed by the oath or affirmation of the party making it, often used as evidence in motions.

What RFPs are used for:

  • Obtaining Evidence: Getting emails, texts, contracts, financial statements, photos, and other tangible items.

  • Supporting/Refuting Claims: Finding data to prove or disprove facts in the lawsuit.

  • Identifying Opponent's Case: Discovering what evidence the other side plans to use. 

How RFPs work:

  • Served by a Party: One side sends a list of specific requests to the other.

  • Response Required: The receiving party must provide the requested items or state valid objections (e.g., privilege, undue burden).

  • Production in Stages: If a large volume, production can be staged, with dates specified.

  • "Meet and Confer": Parties often must discuss objections to resolve issues before court intervention. 

Key aspects:

  • Not for Facts: RFPs request evidence, while interrogatories are for written answers to factual questions.

  • No Federal Limit: Federal rules don't cap RFP numbers, but local rules or court discretion (Rule 26(b)) can limit scope if discovery is excessive or irrelevant.

  • Transparency with Objections: An objection must state if anything is being withheld, requiring a privilege log for privileged items, according to LII and www.advocatemagazine.com

Examples of requested items:

  • Emails, texts, social media data

  • Bank statements, tax returns, payroll stubs

  • Insurance policies, medical records

  • Contracts, business records  narrow down the issues in dispute.

This is just an example. We illustrated some RFP's but there are also RFA's (request for admission) and Interrogatories. All have their purposes and can be very useful.


Stage 3: Depositions and Objections

Civil trial objections are formal protests by lawyers to stop improper questions, testimony, or evidence, ensuring fairness by enforcing rules of evidence, with common types including hearsay, leading questions, relevance, and speculation, requiring a timely, specific statement of the legal grounds, leading to the judge's ruling to sustain (uphold) or overrule (disallow) the objection. 

Common Types of Objections

  • Hearsay: Out-of-court statements offered to prove the truth of the matter asserted (e.g., "He said he saw it happen").

  • Leading Question: A question that suggests the answer (e.g., "You saw the red car, didn't you?").

  • Relevance: Evidence that doesn't relate to the facts of the case.

  • Speculation/Lack of Personal Knowledge: Asking a witness to guess or testify about something they didn't directly experience.

  • Asked and Answered: Asking a question that has already been answered by the witness.

  • Argumentative: A question that challenges or argues with the witness rather than seeking information.

  • Compound Question: A question containing multiple questions at once.

  • Foundation/Authentication: Not establishing necessary background before asking a question or introducing an exhibit.

  • Privilege: Seeking confidential information (e.g., attorney-client). 

How Objections Work

  1. Raise Objection: An attorney stands and says, "Objection, Your Honor, [legal ground]," as soon as the improper question or evidence is presented.

  2. Judge's Ruling: The judge decides if the objection is valid.

  • Sustained: The judge agrees; the question/evidence is disallowed, and the witness usually stops or the evidence is struck.

  • Overruled: The judge disagrees; the question/evidence is allowed to proceed

Next Steps: The objecting lawyer might ask the judge to instruct the jury to disregard testimony if an answer was given before the objection was ruled on, while the questioning lawyer might rephrase the question.

Pro Tip: Consider hiring an attorney on a hybrid or contingency basis for the Deposition and/or also for the Trial.

If you do, you'll want to ensure that they have had plenty of time to understand the intimacies of your specific case. You'll want them to know when to Object and Why, for example. - Don't go alone.


Stage 4: Trial Basics

Trial preparation involves a comprehensive process of gathering evidence, organizing exhibits, preparing witnesses, developing legal arguments, and handling logistics like technology and courtroom procedures, all aimed at building a compelling narrative for the judge and jury, often utilizing discovery, motions, and mock trials to refine strategy and ensure a calm, organized presentation of the case. 

Key Terms:

  • Evidence (Admissible): Information, documents, or objects that the court allows to be used to prove a fact in the case.

  • Burden of Proof: The obligation to prove one's assertion. In civil cases, this is usually the "preponderance of the evidence."

  • Exhibit: A document or object produced and identified in court or for a deposition for use as evidence.

  • Sustained / Overruled: The judge's rulings on objections; "Sustained" means the objection is valid; "Overruled" means the questioning may continue.

  • Motion in Limine: A request made to the court before trial to exclude or admit certain evidence from being presented.

Key Steps in Trial Preparation:

  • Case Strategy & Narrative: Develop a clear theme, story, and legal arguments, outlining the burden of proof and anticipating the opponent's points.

  • Discovery & Evidence: Collect, organize, and exchange all evidence (documents, objects, statements) through discovery, and prepare exhibits, ensuring admissibility.

  • Witness Preparation: Identify, secure (subpoena), and prepare fact and expert witnesses for direct and cross-examination, potentially with mock sessions.

  • Legal Documents: Draft essential documents like trial briefs, jury instructions, opening statements, and closing arguments.

  • Logistics & Technology: Plan courtroom logistics, use trial presentation software, test equipment, and prepare digital and hard copy trial binders.

  • Pre-Trial Motions: File motions (like motions in limine) to resolve issues or exclude evidence before trial.

  • Practice & Review: Conduct mock trials and continuously review and revise the strategy up to the final pretrial conference. 

For Individuals (Not Lawyers):

  • Organize: Keep all documents, evidence, and timelines meticulously organized.

  • Communicate: Stay in close contact with your attorney, asking questions and providing information.

  • Prepare for Testimony: Practice what you'll say, review your statements, and stay calm and credible.

  • Know Your Case: Understand the key facts, evidence, and narrative.

  • Self-Care: Manage stress, as trial prep is demanding. 

There are some common rules that often apply in more than one situation.

Like investing, the principle of Buy Low & Sell High seems to hold true in many cases. I mentioned this earlier, but it’s worth repeating:

“Sometimes it feels like the bigger the organization (and the larger its legal team), the easier it is for ordinary people to be worn down by process instead of heard on the merits. Over time, that can actually encourage more bad behavior and fewer consequences. It makes you wonder where basic ethics and morals have gone.”

One can only speculate whether some people turn to alcohol just to sleep at night, or whether they’ve embraced a worldview where they answer to no one. Perhaps they’ve accepted “relativism” and believe that your truth is different from theirs. If so, I recommend reading Gregg Koukl’s book Relativism.

Whatever the case, be very careful around people who lie for a living—or who coach others to do so.


The Rule of Five: Turning Your Deposition into a Shield

How to Win Any Deposition

In a deposition, your words are oxygen to the defense. The more you talk, the longer they can keep you there. This video introduces the 'Rule of Five'—a defensive strategy designed to neutralize aggressive attorneys and keep your testimony clean and protected. By becoming a 'Depo-Bot' and sticking to five words or less, you ensure that the first time they hear your full story is at trial, not in a conference room where they can twist your words.


The "Bait Question" Technique (Uncovering the Truth)

"The Art of the Bait Question: Testing Witness Credibility"
One of the most powerful tools in truth-extraction is the 'Bait Question.' This technique involves asking a witness a question about a fact they believe is unprovable, giving them the opportunity to be honest or to commit to a falsehood. By withholding forensic or documentary evidence until after a witness has committed to a statement on the record, you create a clear, undeniable contrast for the Court. This video illustrates how to use this psychological leverage to ensure the record reflects reality, not just a prepared narrative.


7 Secret Ways Lawyers Destroy A Witness's Credibility

Advanced Cross-Examination: The "Boxing In" Method
Effective cross-examination is about more than just asking questions; it’s about controlling the narrative. This resource explores the "Gold Standard" of witness control—using tight, leading questions to narrow a witness's options until they are "boxed in" by their own testimony. By maintaining a one-fact-at-a-time approach, you ensure the focus remains on the evidence rather than evasive rhetoric.


The Bonus (Overcoming Evasion)

Overcoming 'I Don't Recall': Refreshing Recollection
When a witness claims they do not remember key facts, the law provides a specific procedure to 'refresh' their memory. This video outlines the steps to use documents or prior statements to legally overcome feigned ignorance on the stand, ensuring that "forgetfulness" does not block the path to the truth.


Chris Daniel running a podcast and YouTube Channel.

Chris Daniel

With a Network Administration background, this former Insurance Claims Adjuster has a knack for investigations mixed with a touch of dark and self deprecating humor. Chris shares insights on social media strategies and insurance claims, blending technical know-how with real-world experience. Learn more about Chris and his projects on the About page.

Chris Daniel - Logo - Proving My Worth By Increasing Yours

Food For Thought

"The fears you don’t face become your limitations."

- Robin Sharma

Chris Daniel's personal Linked-In
Chris Daniel's personal Instagram
Chris Daniel's personal Facebook
Chris Daniel's personal YouTube
Chris Daniel's Personal Pinterest

Disclaimer: These are my personal socials, not the business ones. I’ve never put much into ‘personal branding’ because I’d rather focus on building strategies that actually work. You won’t see me chasing followers or posting every meal — that’s not my style.


All Rights Reserved.